Breaking Tech News, Is It Really Worth it? (Nope)
Well now that TechGeist is dead, and I have officially gotten over how much that blows, I figure I should share what I have learned (rather what little I have learned, whatever) during the life of TechGeist.
One of the goals of TechGeist before ahem… Alex moved to that other blog (in all seriousness, congrats to him, I just enjoy and I am allowed to give him crap), was to become a source of breaking tech news. Obviously that failed (epically, might I add) but we did end up breaking a few Hulu stories and an Amazon kindle story. All of them ended up on Techmeme and linked to by various big-name sites such as Mashable and CrunchGear.
Obviously we had a geekgasm every time this happened, but just like any orgasm, it was super friggin awesome for about a whole ten seconds. Sure, using Clicky we saw the hits roll in like it was 4th of July of fireworks, but only for about one hour. After that initial hour, the traffic jump was reminiscent to that of a trickling rainfall after a random ass downpour. After that day the traffic on those posts was reminiscent of…
nothing.
Not one of those posts have gotten a hit in the past month. Not one.
#FAIL
Instead, the posts that are still getting hits are posts like my review of Brizzly, my post about Google Wave and even my post about the Chrome theme fiasco. None of these posts garnered +1000 hits on within minutes of publishing, but none of them can beat the 3,000+ hits my Brizzly, Wave and theme post have each garnered over time via search hits and random linkings across the twitterverse.
You know what makes this even more awesome? These non-exclusive, non-breaking tech posts are still bringing in 600+ hits a day to a tech blog that is now dead.
Can breaking news do that?
